In this article

These cards tell two different stories about a food budget. Savor is comfortable with the grocery run and the nights you decide not to cook. Blue Cash Preferred puts more emphasis on qualifying supermarket purchases, then adds useful rewards on gas, streaming and transit.

The 6% supermarket headline makes Preferred look like the obvious grocery choice. But the annual fee, the $6,000 supermarket cap and Savor’s stronger restaurant return make this a closer decision than it first appears.

We would start with where your food money actually goes. Then bring the rest of the household back into the calculation before choosing.

Our take: Savor for a simple food routine, Preferred for a measured gain

Savor is the easier starting point if you want qualifying groceries and restaurants on one card, dislike category caps and prefer no annual fee. It also earns 3% on qualifying entertainment and popular streaming, with an ordinary 1% fallback. Savor terms

Blue Cash Preferred can earn more when you have enough qualifying U.S. supermarket purchases and useful gas, streaming or transit spending. Its recurring fee should be covered by an actual advantage over your alternative, not just by gross rewards you could also earn elsewhere. Preferred terms

If the calculation produces a small lead for Preferred, ask whether that lead survives a change in stores, more restaurant spending or a subscription cancellation. A paid card is more comfortable when its value has some room to spare.

The rates that drive the choice

Purchase or cost Savor Rewards Blue Cash Preferred
Qualifying groceries 3%, uncapped 6% at eligible U.S. supermarkets on first $6,000 per calendar year, then 1%
Eligible dining 3% Ordinary 1%
Eligible entertainment 3% Ordinary 1%
Eligible streaming 3% on qualifying popular services 6% on select U.S. services
Eligible gas Ordinary 1% 3% at U.S. gas stations
Eligible transit Ordinary 1% 3%
Other ordinary eligible purchases 1% 1%
Annual fee $0 $0 first year in reviewed offer, then $95
Foreign transaction fee None 2.7%

The compared Savor is the current $0-fee Rewards version; similarly named card versions and older accounts can have different terms. Preferred’s supermarket limit is account-wide, including eligible additional-card purchases. Capital One catalog Amex terms

Superstores and warehouse clubs do not qualify for these cards’ ordinary supermarket bonuses under the reviewed definitions. Preferred’s higher supermarket and gas rates are U.S.-specific. A delivery platform or restaurant inside another business can also submit merchant information different from what the purchase’s everyday description suggests. Amex categories Savor definitions

First compare groceries with restaurants

Below $6,000 in qualifying annual supermarket purchases, Preferred earns three percentage points more on groceries but two percentage points less on dining, then pays its $95 ongoing fee.

If all other differences are set to zero, its advantage is:

3% of qualifying groceries − 2% of dining − $95.

Annual qualifying groceries Annual dining Preferred’s net advantage Food-only result
$3,600 $1,200 −$11 Savor leads
$4,800 $1,200 $25 Preferred leads
$4,800 $3,600 −$23 Savor leads
$6,000 $3,600 $13 Preferred leads

At $4,800 in qualifying groceries, the dining tie is $2,450: ($144 in extra grocery rewards − $95) ÷ 2%. More restaurant spending favors Savor in this deliberately limited model.

That threshold is a way to evaluate purchases already in your life. It is not a reason to spend less or more on a particular category just to make a credit card look better.

Above the supermarket cap, Savor catches up

At $9,600 of qualifying annual groceries, Preferred earns $360 on the first $6,000 and $36 on the remaining $3,600: $396 before its fee, or $301 afterward. Savor earns $288 at its uncapped 3%.

Preferred’s grocery-only lead is therefore $13. Add $3,600 in dining and Savor earns $108 there while Preferred earns $36. The $72 dining advantage gives Savor a $59 lead across this food-only budget: $396 for Savor versus $337 for Preferred after the fee.

This can feel counterintuitive. Preferred’s grocery advantage grows up to the cap, then starts shrinking relative to Savor as additional groceries earn 1% versus 3%. A larger food budget does not automatically make the paid card stronger.

A suitable fallback changes the overflow calculation, but it adds a routing rule. If you want to compare that setup, use one card versus two rather than assuming every dollar remains on the grocery specialist.

The rest of the household can put Preferred back ahead

Our common $24,000 household has $4,800 qualifying supermarkets, $3,600 dining, $2,400 eligible gas, $360 eligible streaming, $600 transit and $12,240 of other purchases. There are no entertainment tickets or portal bookings in this base case.

Annual spending Savor rewards Preferred rewards
$4,800 supermarkets $144 $288
$3,600 dining $108 $36
$2,400 gas $24 $72
$360 streaming $10.80 $21.60
$600 transit $6 $18
$12,240 other $122.40 $122.40
Gross rewards $415.20 $558
Recurring fee $0 −$95
Ongoing net $415.20 $463

Preferred leads by $47.80 a year, or about $3.98 a month. The food-only portion favored Savor by $23; Preferred’s extra $48 on gas, $10.80 on streaming and $12 on transit reverse the outcome.

These results also trail $480 on a suitable flat 2% card used for the same purchases. Winning this two-card comparison does not establish the best all-purpose card in the market. The main household comparison keeps that wider baseline visible.

A dining table with pasta on one side and a grocery bag on the other, illustrating the balance between dining and supermarket spending.
Resolve an uncapped grocery/dining card against a capped supermarket card with a fee.

Store choice can make the lead fragile

Move $1,200 of that household’s qualifying supermarket spending to ordinary purchases at an excluded warehouse club that accepts both cards, without changing total purchases. Assume the membership is already useful independently of the cards. Both cards now earn the ordinary 1% there.

Savor loses $24, falling to $391.20. Preferred loses $60, falling to $403 after its fee. Preferred’s lead shrinks from $47.80 to $11.80.

Alternatively, return to the original model and shift $2,400 of ordinary purchases into eligible entertainment. Savor gains $48 because those purchases move from 1% to 3%; Preferred’s ordinary return stays the same. Savor reaches $463.20, just 20 cents ahead of Preferred’s $463.

The second example is not permission to create an entertainment budget to win a comparison. It shows how a household that already buys qualifying tickets can reasonably reach a different answer from one focused on gas and transit.

Use the merchant classification guide when the store mix is uncertain. Your grocery budget label is less useful than the transactions that actually qualify.

Compare specialist pairings if you already use a 2% card

Give Savor the shared household’s $8,760 in qualifying groceries, dining and streaming at 3%, and a suitable 2% card the remaining $15,240. The result is $262.80 + $304.80 = $567.60.

Give Preferred its useful supermarket, gas, streaming and transit purchases, and use the 2% fallback elsewhere. After Preferred’s $95 fee, the result is $621.40.

Preferred’s pairing leads by $53.80 annually, about $4.48 a month. Compared with a single 2% card earning $480, Savor’s pairing adds $87.60 and Preferred’s adds $141.40.

This gives the extra account a specific price tag in your decision. It also prevents the mistake of adding a specialist’s entire reward total to a fallback that has already been credited for the same purchases.

The first-year offers are conditional, and they are different

The reviewed Savor offer is $200 after $500 in eligible purchases in three months. Preferred’s public prospect offer is as high as $300 after $3,000 in six months, with the actual offer determined through the application process. A separate observed member channel showed $150 after $3,000 in qualifying purchases in six months. Savor offer Preferred prospect offer Preferred member offer

Using the original one-card household and Preferred’s reviewed first-year fee waiver:

First-year case Savor Preferred
No welcome bonus $415.20 $558
Stated Savor offer / observed Preferred member offer, if earned $615.20 $708
Stated Savor offer / maximum Preferred prospect offer, if earned $615.20 $858

The maximum Amex offer is not a guaranteed $300. Nor should its larger spending requirement encourage an extra purchase. Both spending clocks start at account opening. After you meet the requirement, Savor allows two billing cycles for the bonus to reach the rewards balance; Preferred allows 8–12 weeks for its bonus Reward Dollars. Use the exact offer you receive and purchases already planned within the deadline.

At renewal, the $95 fee returns and the welcome bonus does not repeat automatically. A stronger first-year result is useful information, but it does not settle the ongoing choice.

Credits and foreign purchases deserve their own lines

Preferred offers up to $10 monthly for qualifying direct Disney-related subscriptions after enrollment under the current benefit terms. If you would already keep an eligible monthly subscription and use every credit, the actual savings can strengthen Preferred’s case. If you add a service merely to receive the credit, include the new cost. An annual charge does not create twelve monthly credits. Preferred benefit terms

Our base model values optional credits at $0. Its ordinary streaming rewards are already included, so do not count them twice when adding an actual statement credit.

For international use, Savor’s lack of a foreign transaction fee is a meaningful advantage. On an otherwise ordinary $1,000 foreign purchase, Preferred’s 1% reward is $10 and its 2.7% fee is $27, leaving a $17 loss. Savor at its ordinary 1% earns $10 with no issuer foreign fee–a $27 advantage on that charge before exchange or other differences. Savor fees Preferred fees

The higher U.S. supermarket and gas rates on Preferred should not be carried into an overseas budget. Confirm acceptance and the actual category for the purchases you expect to make.

Choose the card that fits next year, too

Savor is comfortable for a household that wants food and entertainment rewards without a fee or grocery cap. Preferred is compelling when qualifying supermarket, gas, streaming and transit purchases produce a worthwhile recurring advantage that survives ordinary changes in spending.

If no annual fee is your main preference but online shopping matters more than restaurants, Everyday versus Preferred may be the closer comparison. If most food purchases are at warehouses or superstores, use the broader grocery guide.

Both cards permit usable cash-equivalent redemption under their terms, but the routes differ: Savor offers statement credits or checks, while Preferred uses Reward Dollars for statement credits or eligible Amazon checkout. A reward credit does not replace the required card payment. Interest can erase the modest annual differences shown here. Savor cash options Preferred Reward Dollars

Frequently asked questions

Which is better for restaurants?

Savor’s ordinary qualifying dining rate is 3%, compared with Preferred’s ordinary 1%. Preferred’s other categories can still produce a stronger whole-household result.

Does a bigger grocery budget always favor Preferred?

No. Its supermarket rate falls to 1% after $6,000 in qualifying calendar-year purchases, while Savor’s eligible grocery rate remains 3%. The relative grocery advantage then shrinks.

Do Walmart, Target and warehouse groceries qualify?

Do not assume so. These cards’ supermarket definitions exclude superstores and warehouse clubs. Use merchant-specific rules before putting purchases into a grocery calculation.

Should I count Preferred’s maximum bonus?

Only if that is the actual offer you receive and earn. The public maximum and observed member offer differ, and both belong in a separate first-year comparison.

Which is easier to use abroad?

Savor’s no-foreign-fee structure gives it a cost advantage over Preferred’s 2.7% fee. Acceptance, merchant categories and checkout currency choices still matter.

How we reviewed it: We compared current product and observed offer-channel terms, isolated grocery/dining tradeoffs, then added a consistent whole-household budget and fallback scenarios. Models use cash values, no speculative travel transfers, no optional credits unless stated, and planned purchases paid in full to preserve the purchase grace period. These are illustrations rather than personal card-use claims.

Sources & references5 sources